Submission
| Authors |
Roger O'Keefe 
|
|
| Title | Theory and the Doctrinal International Lawyer | |
| Original file | 755-887-1-SM.pdf 2015-10-19 | |
| Supp. files | None Add a Supplementary File | |
| Submitter |
UCLJLJ Editor
|
|
| Date submitted | 2015-10-19 | |
| Section | Articles | |
| Abstract Views | 1219 | |
Editors
Status
| Status | Published Vol 4, No 2 (2015) | Reject and Archive Submission |
| Initiated | 2015-10-19 | |
| Last modified | 2016-11-07 | |
Submission Metadata
Authors
| Name |
Roger O'Keefe
|
| Affiliation | — |
| Country | — |
| Bio Statement | — |
| Principal contact for editorial correspondence. | |
Title and Abstract
| Title | Theory and the Doctrinal International Lawyer |
| Abstract | How to lose friends and influence people prejudicially? Say ‘theory’ to a doctrinal international lawyer. Choose your target particularly unwisely and you may even have her reaching for her gun. At least this is the stereotype. The popular image, especially among theorists, is that ‘black-letter’ international lawyers are hostile to theoretical approaches to their field. Like many popular images, there is a grain of truth in it. Ditto, it is a caricature. Doctrinal international lawyers are more latitudinarian than infamy allows. Some of their best friends are theorists, while some go so far as to dabble in the black arts themselves. It takes all sorts.
NB: full text is availabe here: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1472295/ |
Indexing
| Keywords | — |
| Language | en |
Supporting Agencies
| Agencies | — |
Copyright © 2018 UCL | Disclaimer | Freedom of Information | Privacy and Cookies