Article

Balancing Competition and Stability in the Era of Gamified Investing:  An Analysis of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Competition Mandate on Mobile Trading Apps and its Impact on Financial Stability and Consumer Protection

Author: James Isaacs orcid logo

  • 

Balancing Competition and Stability in the Era of Gamified Investing: 

An Analysis of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Competition Mandate on Mobile Trading Apps and its Impact on Financial Stability and Consumer Protection

    Article

    Balancing Competition and Stability in the Era of Gamified Investing:  An Analysis of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Competition Mandate on Mobile Trading Apps and its Impact on Financial Stability and Consumer Protection

    Author:

Abstract

The rise of mobile trading applications (“MTAs”) has largely been facilitated by the Financial Conduct Authority's (“FCA”) competition mandate and has democratized access to financial markets. However, the increased competition has led MTAs to deepen gamification techniques, ultimately encouraging impulsive trading behaviour amongst retail investors. This article examines how gamification, coupled with social media influence, poses significant financial risks, including market volatility and systemic risk. It suggests a proactive regulatory approach, emphasizing investor education to mitigate risks. While such efforts can reduce risks, they cannot eliminate them entirely and as such, the FCA faces a crossroads in how they wish to deal with their competing mandates of competition and consumer protection.

Keywords: gamification, mobile trading apps, financial stability, financial conduct authority, MiFID II, consumer protection, investor protection, GameStop, gamestop

How to Cite:

Isaacs, J., (2024) “ Balancing Competition and Stability in the Era of Gamified Investing:  An Analysis of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Competition Mandate on Mobile Trading Apps and its Impact on Financial Stability and Consumer Protection ”, Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 13(1), 1-35. doi: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444.2052-1871.1851

Downloads:
Download PDF
View PDF

174 Views

16 Downloads

Published on
30 Nov 2024
Peer Reviewed